>>>>> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RJ> Having just had the opportunity to run check_perms again
RJ> (because one of my newly created lists failed to inhereit the
RJ> right group. When the one before and after it did. I love
RJ> computers sometimes), I noticed one picky little detail. If
RJ> you run it without the -f, and it finds errors, it tells you
RJ> to run it -f to fix them. That's fine. If you *do* run it
RJ> -f, and it finds, and fixes, errors, it *still* tells you to
RJ> rerun it -f to fix the errors...
You actually do want to run it twice, or at least until no more errors
are reported.
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
