Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just MHO, but I wouldn't roll a release just for the message-id > patch. I'd put it in the 2.1 tree, and if something else makes a > 2.0.10 worthwhile, roll it then.
Do you mean the 2.0 tree? 2.1 already adds a Message-ID (with different code). It's up to Barry I guess, but I was thinking that a 2.0.10 would be easy because 2.0.9 was never formally announced. Release numbers are cheap. -- (http://tmda.sourceforge.net/) _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
