On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:02:25 -0600 Jason R Mastaler <Jason> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry A. Warsaw) writes:
>> If what you say is the case -- builtin support isn't terribly useful >> without the shared whitelist -- then maybe it does make sense to >> defer until a later Mailman version. > Some users will not want to use a shared whitelist, but in my > experience, the vast majority will. I predict that if you add the > feature without this sub-feature, it will become a nagging FAQ. At its root its a privacy and entrance notification problem. Its not so much that the whitelist is private, but that entering it for discrete list populations is a hard edged and published (to the list owner or subscriber base) event, as distinct from the global whitelist. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
