On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 01:31, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > Where should I go from here? I'm willing to put up a patch set on SF > if folks want to play with it. I'm also willing to check it into cvs, > but /only/ if it's labeled experimental for MM2.1. I think this could > improve the efficiency of handling incoming message, but it's equally > likely my code is being too naive. I don't want to officially support > it for MM2.1, but I /would/ like to get some feedback and experience > with it. > > Comments, thoughts? > -Barry
Sounds nice to me, though I hope this is something you will add in MM2.2 (or 3.0 if there never is a 2.2 ;). Because 2.1 _really_ should go out the door Real Soon(tm). ;) Maybe using Maildir will make it easier to fully support virtual domains in the future? i.e. two lists having the same name but different domains? This is a feature I'm really waiting for in the next version. (And I'm sure I'm not the only one..) Just my $0.02. :) -Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
