Simone Piunno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> (yeah, I know that reply-to munging is considered harmful but I > >>> consider more important to keep discussions inside the lists and > >>> anyway this has
Sounds like you've never seen a list blow up in a mail loop because of some broken "vacation" autoresponder robot which sends automated responses to the Reply-To: address. > >> I'm just amazed at how many times I've read this complete nonsense. > > > Marc, I see you are the only one fighting my request and I have 3 > > people saying it's ok for them. J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied: > No, for most of us know this religious debate of old, are tired of it, > understand it far better than we're interested in Yes. > Given a list which munges Reply-To in any manner, how do I: > > a) Move a thread on to a different list? > > b) Ensure that all replies default to me only and not the list (so > that I may summarise later)? > > c) Trivially (default command) reply to author only? > > d) Remove myself from followups to a thread? e) Cross-post a discussion across two mailing lists? (Sometimes that is the right thing to do.) f) Ensure that my backup email address gets copied on a thread? (E.g. Because my primary email address which is subscribed to the list is temporarily broken or something.) Greetings, Norbert. -- Founder & Steering Committee member of http://gnu.org/projects/dotgnu/ Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland) Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/mailman-developers
