At 05:34 PM 11/7/02 -0500, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: >>>>>> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RJ> I'd file a bug report on this, but I'm on my out the door and > RJ> won't be online the rest of the night, and will likely forget > RJ> about it until the next time I look at the errorlog... This is > RJ> after applying updates *yesterday*, although nothing checked > RJ> in so far today would seem to apply.. Only happened once, > RJ> although plenty of messages have gone through different lists > RJ> that would have archived. > >Okay, I just checked in some fixes for this, I believe. See the >bin/b4b5-archfix script. Do a normal update then run this as >specified in the docstring (use --help for details). > >I've done a little testing with this but will verify with more lists >momentarily.
Hey, Barry, or did your testing not include actually *doing* a -h? :-) Given that it causes a traceback, because b4b5-archfix is missing a from Mailman.i18n import _ _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
