>>>>> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> So, unless I'm missing something, if you use VERP, you should
MM> be able to process any bounce from a subscriber.
Right.
MM> Is it desirable for mailman to pass on a VERP bounce coming
MM> from a held message notification sent to a non subscriber?
No.
MM> Would it make sense for mailman if it receives a bounce that
MM> is obviously verped and that there is no such member, to just
MM> drop it silently (maybe with a log entry)?
Yes. Actually, in a patch I worked out over the weekend (and one of
many I hope to check in in the morning), I log and drop any recoginzed
bounce that yielded a non-member address. That seems like the most
reasonable behavior. The current forwarding was mostly for debugging
purposes, but I think it's just more annoying than useful.
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
