Bugs item #652001, was opened at 2002-12-11 07:43
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=652001&group_id=103
Category: mail delivery
Group: 2.1 beta
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Gibbs (midrangeman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Reply-to munging not using correct host
Initial Comment:
Mailman 5.1b6 is not using the lists configured host
name for the reply_to address ... it is using the default
host name instead.
I have mailman configured for virtual hosting ... the two
hosts registered are 'midrange.com'
and 'lists.fallingrock.net'.
Default.py has the standard:
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST,
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
and I've added the following to mm_cfg.py:
VIRTUAL_HOST_OVERVIEW = 1
add_virtualhost('lists.fallingrock.net', 'lists.fallingrock.net')
My test list is configured with:
host_name = 'lists.fallingrock.net'
first_strip_reply_to = 1
reply_goes_to_list = 1
reply_to_address = ''
When I post a message to my test list, the reply-to
header reflects my DEFAULT host name instead of the
list's host name...
>Return-Path: <beta-testers-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from linux.midrange.com (localhost
[127.0.0.1])
> by linux.midrange.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with
ESMTP id gB8FtTa02925;
> Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:55:29 -0600
>Received: from GRYFFINDOR.midrange.com
(gryffindor.midrange.com
> [192.168.1.100])
> by linux.midrange.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with
ESMTP id gB8FtLi02900
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:55:21 -0600
>Message-Id:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified)
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
5.2.0.9
>Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 09:55:17 -0600
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [beta-testers] Up for another round?
>In-Reply-To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii";
format=flowed
>X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: New Feature Beta Testers <beta-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Id: New Feature Beta Testers <beta-
testers.lists.fallingrock.net>
>List-Unsubscribe:
><http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/listinfo/beta-
testers>,
>
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive:
<http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/private/beta-
testers>
>List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Help: <mailto:beta-testers-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe:
<http://lists.fallingrock.net/mailman2/listinfo/beta-
testers>,
> <mailto:beta-testers-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2002-12-23 23:40
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=12800
I still cannot reproduce this. When I turn the reply-to
options on I get the expected virtual host, regardless of
whether the host was my primary or secondary host.
Without the patch, I'm going to have to close this as
irreproducible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=652001&group_id=103
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
