Dear Mailman developers,
first, thanks a LOT for the great software!
Since I didn't find it easy to submit a bug report
(for mailman 2.1) --- it was easy to **browse** bug reports,
but not to submit via sourceforge ---
I allow myself to forward this to you.
Note this is one of many "Uncaught bounce notification"s I'm
getting --- which clearly should have been caught.
An even clearer one, yesterday was "User unknown" :
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to akasolvr.vub.ac.be.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User mathie.roelants unknown at vub.ac.be
550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown
----- Message header follows -----
Thanks a lot for hints,
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/
Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16 Leonhardstr. 27
ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich SWITZERLAND
phone: x-41-1-632-3408 fax: ...-1228 <><
--- Begin Message ---
The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce
format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted
from it. This mailing list has been configured to send all
unrecognized bounce messages to the list administrator(s).
For more information see:
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/admin/r-help/bounce
--- Begin Message ---
---- Failed Recipients ----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail Loop Detected
Requested action aborted: Mail loop detected
---- Contents of the undelivered mail ----
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 10:27:28 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 10:20:53 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 10:13:20 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 10:06:31 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 10:02:42 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:58:56 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:55:15 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:52:48 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:50:34 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:46:33 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:43:12 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:42:15 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:41:00 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:40:09 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:37:35 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:36:54 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:36:16 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:36:02 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:35:52 2003
-0500
Received: FROM mailgate.chmcc.org BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:35:43 2003
-0500
Received: FROM hypatia.math.ethz.ch BY mailgate.chmcc.org ; Wed Mar 12 09:33:34 2003
-0500
Received: from hypatia.math.ethz.ch ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [129.132.58.23])
by hypatia.math.ethz.ch (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2CEh9gB009924;
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:50:15 +0100 (MET)
Received: from gate.precheza.cz (gate.precheza.cz [80.188.29.242])
by hypatia.math.ethz.ch (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2CDx8fV004976
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:59:09 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by gate.precheza.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP
id EFBD0B99; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:59:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.precheza.cz (smtp.precheza.cz [192.9.210.29])
by gate.precheza.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 76C23FE; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:59:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 192.168.210.65 ([192.168.210.65]) by mail.precheza.cz (WinRoute
Pro 4.2.1) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:53:01 +0100
From: "Petr Pikal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:58:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [R] changing pen mode [or adjusting for overlapping points?]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.43
X-Spam-Level:
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main R Mailing List: Primary help <r-help.stat.math.ethz.ch>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
On 11 Mar 2003 at 16:28, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> > Finally, you might also consider using the 'cex' argument in both
> > plot() and points(), which can reduce the size of the plotting
> > symbols. The default for par(cex) is 1.0, so you might try smaller
> > values.
>
> Changing the pointsize helps a bit, however, it makes the points that
> aren't overlapped almost impossible to see. [Single pixels in a
> 1900x1600 plot are quite hard for my eyes to dicern, and it basically
> gets back to a mere density plot.]
>
> What I'm really looking for is a method to adjust the mode in which
> the points are drawn, so that those that overlap a point of a
> different color produce yet a third color in the region of overlap.
>
something like that?
x<-rlnorm(10000)
y<-rnorm(10000,mean=0.5)
overlap<-which(abs(x-y)<.1)
plot(1:10000,x)
points(1:10000,y,col=2)
points((1:10000)[overlap],y[overlap],col=3)
>
> Don Armstrong
>
> --
> "I was thinking seven figures," he said, "but I would have taken a
> hundred grand. I'm not a greedy person." [All for a moldy bottle of
> tropicana.]
> -- Sammi Hadzovic [in Andy Newman's 2003/02/14 NYT article.]
> http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/14/nyregion/14EYEB.html
>
> http://www.donarmstrong.com
> http://www.anylevel.com
> http://rzlab.ucr.edu
>
CheersPetr Pikal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
