On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 19:24, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> If this patch works, then I'll probably apply it as a fallback, but I'll
> want to make sure the scrubber is fixed too, otherwise it's possible
> that your mbox archive is also broken (though you wouldn't notice it
> until you regenerated your pipermail archives).
This dawned on me at practice. The previous patch was probably no good,
but this one might be <wink>. I'll test it out tomorrow night.
-Barry
Index: ToDigest.py
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/mailman/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py,v
retrieving revision 2.27
diff -u -r2.27 ToDigest.py
--- ToDigest.py 11 Apr 2003 03:06:14 -0000 2.27
+++ ToDigest.py 7 Aug 2003 03:42:19 -0000
@@ -74,8 +74,13 @@
mboxfp = open(mboxfile, 'a+')
finally:
os.umask(omask)
- g = Generator(mboxfp)
- g.flatten(msg, unixfrom=True)
+ # Get the message as a string, with the envelope, which is required by the
+ # UnixMailbox code which composes the digest.
+ msgstr = msg.as_string(unixfrom=True)
+ extra = not msgstr.endswith('\n\n')
+ mboxfp.write(msgstr)
+ if extra:
+ mboxfp.write('\n\n')
# Calculate the current size of the accumulation file. This will not tell
# us exactly how big the MIME, rfc1153, or any other generated digest
# message will be, but it's the most easily available metric to decide
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
