> This is seriously weird. Back before pipermail was integrated > into mailman, my understanding is that the then-current version was > the best available MLM archive tool, heads and shoulders above > everything else -- especially mhonarc. Moreover, my understanding > was that pipermail had only improved significantly beyond where it > was at the time of initial integration. > > Has mhonarc improved so much in the meantime that it has now > overtaken the current version of pipermail?
Hi Brad, Try it for yourself. Maybe your needs are different. But if I want an archiver that will process huge mbox file from other systems - without crapping out, will decode encoded binary attachments, have flexible, customizable output, etc., I can't think of anything else I would rather use. If MHonarc is so bad, why do so many people go the extra lengths currently required in order to use it instead of pipermail? As I say, it works for me. And very well. Maybe worth a second look? If you try it again let me know what you find. - Kevin _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
