On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 03:22, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Congratulation for getting 2.1.3 out of the door!
Thanks. Please understand that I no longer get to work on Mailman as part of my day job, so I fit it in between everything else that's going on. More than anything else, that drives what gets into patch releases and what doesn't. As I've mentioned before, I would like to find more time to work on the new version (be that 2.2 or 3.0 or both). I would love to find some one or a small group of people who would be willing and able to more or less own the 2.1 maintenance branch. Barring that, a rich uncle, winning lottery ticket, or a slightly nuts VC with bulging pockets who likes to smoke $100 bills would probably help things too. :) > * What attributes do bugs need to get into the next release > when a fix is available. As announced on the 14th of August to this > list I fixed a priority 7 bug and did not receive feedback on it. > Is there a special reason why it wasn't included in the 2.1.3 release? Lack of time is the only answer, and it's not a good one. The deal is that there were enough fixes in CVS, and enough time had gone by since 2.1.2 that I felt a new release was warranted. -Barry _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers