On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:00:57PM +0000, Iain Bapty wrote: > Which of the functional requirements, 6 to 13, do you feel are the most > important?
I think they are all quite basic. I think personally 10 and 12 are 'should-haves' in my opinion. Also have a look at the "SMART Archiver" project, http://sourceforge.net/projects/smartarchiver/ A replacement for the standard GNU Mailman archiver that supports attachments, searching, date selection, message editing and more, requires a database such as postgressql (mysql support is coming in a future version) > ... > Is there anything obvious that I have missed? Other requirements you might consider: - db support for Zope, http://zope.org - support for mime-attachements (PDF, Word, etc.) - to be able to fix threading issues through the web (people starting a new subject by reply'ing on a previous post, fix threading for mailreaders that don't support proper "In-Reply-To" threading. - Unix mbox output (based on the db). That would make it easy to upgrade, or to change to a different archiver. - support for a 'view complete thread' (this would really be nice!) - python based, because that would make it fit better with mailman and will make it easier to install - easy to use api for adding new messages (e.g. use it as an archiver for wiki discussions, such as http://zwiki.org/GeneralDiscussion ) - be able to override message-view class (e.g. so that wiki's can add wiki linking or similar features to the messages) Regards, PieterB -- If your next pot of chili tastes better, it probably is because of something left out, rather than added. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers