On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:52:44PM +0000, Richard Barrett wrote: > >I agree with Jeff. I don't plan on maintaining my SpamAssassin patch > >passed its current incarnation. I welcome a standard implementation. > > Might I ask why enthusiasts for integration SpamAssassin with Mailman > do not care about delivery of spam to other mail aliases in their > domain. And if they do so care, why do they not concentrate on stopping > spam reaching all of their mail aliases. > > I guess I cannot understand why you are messing around integrating > SpammAssassin with Mailman when you should be integrating it with your > MTA so that the spam never gets anywhere near Mailman. That's actually the reason why I'm no longer maintaining my patch; I've moved to an amavisd / SpamAssassin system that hangs off of Postfix's delivery chain.
Because of this, I'd still like to see a standard SpamAssassin-aware handler in Mailman that could react to the tagged messages. -- Jon Parise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
