On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:08:24 -0500 Terri Oda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:07:39AM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
> I know there are great alternative archivers out there, but Mailman > still winds up with a bad reputation if the default isn't very secure. Disagreed. > Maybe for 2.2 we could have a "completely obscure archived email > addresses" option which changed them all to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another option, and the one I advocate, is to replace all email addresses with TMDA-style dated addresses, much in the manner GMane does. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
