On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 02:09:05 -0700 Jim Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the code, comments, etc. it appears that removal of all parts > other than the first non-empty alternative is intended as a feature > and considered a good thing. Is this correct? Yes, in particular many of us consider multipart/alternative mail with text/plain and text/html parts to be very unwelcome. Heck, many of us consider that HTML mail of any form is decidedly unwelcome. > Is the decision motivated by something deeper than simply eliminating > some extra bytes? Yes. > Besides turning off filtering altogether, is there any other simple > way to get Mailman to pass multipart/alternative as-is? Stripping > alternatives is not likely to be acceptable for the environment to > which we would be deploying. Sure, turn off the filter via that list's fitering configuration. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
