Adrian Wells wrote: > >It does not appear that more comments have been made on this issue. I am >trying to work with the output of the Mailman logs (Brad Knowles has a >great script ><http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1123383&group_id=103&atid=300103> >for this but, it would be preferred to store more information in a >database for reporting- not sure the best way to do this yet) and this >minor difference is slightly annoying. Additionally, as Mark noted, no >reason has been given to explain difference from other "current bounce >score" messages. Here is a patch that should correct this difference: > > >--- Bouncer.py.10.25.2005.original 2005-10-25 12:21:57.000000000 -0400 >+++ Bouncer.py.log.patch 2005-11-11 11:27:08.000000000 -0500 >@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ > info.score += weight > info.date = day > syslog('bounce', '%s: %s current bounce score: %s', >- member, self.internal_name(), info.score) >+ self.internal_name(), member, info.score) > # Continue to the check phase below > # > # Now that we've adjusted the bounce score for this bounce, let's > > >Unless there is a case against filing this as a bug on SourceForge, I'm >willing to file one within the next couple weeks.
The above patch has been committed to CVS. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
