On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 16:38 +0900, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > I think you are talking about: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1008865&group_id=103&atid=300103 > > Hopefully, we will be back to the MAIN CVS tree for the development of > mailman-2.2 after the release of 2.1.7. This should be the chance that > the patch is integrated in the 2.2 release.
There's also http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=713522&group_id=103&atid=300103 which is my Spambayes integration patch. I do think mailman-developers is a reasonable place to discuss this. We can talk about whether it's even reasonable to have anti-spam defenses in Mailman, and if so whether we want to pick one such product to support, or have a pluggable architecture (possibly shipping one by default). I also think there are interesting usability/user interface questions to ask, as well as whether spam filters should be per-list, site-wide, or domain-wide. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
