Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>Note to developers:
>
>It seems we should move this from Cleanse.py to ToOutgoing.py for
>exactly the reasons expressed earlier in this thread, but I'm a little
>uneasy about mucking with headers in ToOutgoing as that isn't its
>purpose. Any comments?

And Barry Warsaw commented previously:

>Or to add a simpler handler (maybe something called CleanseDKIM.py?) 
>and add that to OWNER_PIPELINE, possibly refactoring out those from 
>Cleanse.py so we don't duplicate code.

Barry's comment seems to me to be the way to go. I'll work up a patch.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan

_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&amp;file=faq01.027.htp

Reply via email to