Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> The pass through of the 'hold' action if the message is to -owner seems >> right to me, but discarding instead of rejecting a 'reject' action if >> the message is to -owner seems wrong. > >Well, then it should be passed. Rejection makes it another loop of >rejection notices if an initial poster forges the From: address as >list-owner. Yes, I tested this. Nothing could stop this if the mailman >qrunner wasn't stopped. (Maybe growing size of rejection notice would >hit the MTA limit.)
Ahh. I hadn't thought of that. Maybe discard it, but put something in the comment about the potential loop if we reject. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
