>>>>> "BAW" == Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> I agree that this is what we should hope for. Our data
BAW> supporting the rewriting of Sender is many years out of date,
BAW> so we need to gather more data. Who's brave enough to try
BAW> it? :)
If this can be done by modifying the list-specific pipeline, you got a
volunteer. I'm willing to volunteer XEmacs's lists---our users can
deal with it, and if need be I can revert without much lossage. We
share the MM installation with others, though, so it has to be
something done by substituting a modified Handler for our lists only.
You'll also need to tell me what I should be looking for; I have had
no need to pay much attention to MM bounces for several years.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
