On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 09:12 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > >I understand why it is removed from the recipient list - that's the > >whole point - but does anyone know/remember why it is also removed > >from the Cc: header? This seems unnecessary and inconsistent since it > >isn't removed from To:, Resent-To: or Resent-Cc:. > > I looked at the subversion (from cvs) log messages and found from Barry: > > process(): If a member has enabled their DontReceiveDuplicates option, > we'll also strip their addresses from CC headers in the list copy. > This helps keep the CC lines from growing astronomically. > > I guess that answers the 'why'. Should we try to address the > inconsistency?
We can, although I think in practice it doesn't come up often. I have seen long CC headers but usually the Resents, and even the To header don't get insanely long. But consistency would be good here I think! -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
