-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 29, 2006, at 2:46 AM, David Lee wrote:
> Is there an estimate of likely timescale for 2.2 ? (Yes, I know these > things slip! But approximate: two months? six months? a year?) > When > you get to the beta stage, I would hope we could offer to try it. I'd really like to see a 2.2 in 2006, but I haven't worked backward to think about what an alpha/beta schedule would look like to accomplish that. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBRKOlkXEjvBPtnXfVAQJmbwP8D0GlbihIIHEvimZ3rCvR+HV/Gd+1JaqN ClMR1DPrIA09tDzY+MOwzZrdji+mNRUeAsjxv9kiEh9Bo548SO61PNFTNcsmPQB2 Y4uqeRSSYRbv+H/63AXamLhKefuJMRZlldn5lrXpnTOszFCI7trodPwM+/J/JJZN 5SHTxTVfOJ0= =LYaC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
