On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jul 6, 2006, at 2:33 PM, John Dennis wrote: > > > My apologies, I have yet to read Barry's SQL work so perhaps the issue > > of how a user is defined has been greatly enhanced over the current > > 2.1 > > model. > > It hasn't and frankly I don't see that as a possibility in the MM2.2 > time frame. Not to discourage experimentation by Ethan, David and > others, but it will necessarily be a hybrid solution until MM3.
That's an OK answer for me, because it gives a realistic view of what the next couple of years hold, and indicates that fully solving the user-database issue is a major task. Thanks. So because of our local need for a simple sender-based authentication scheme, I should probably aim for something small, easy and local simply to get us through the next year or two, while fully aware that we might have to do a (possibly significant) transition job further down the road. Thanks. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : Durham University : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. : _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
