--On 7 August 2006 20:35:06 -0500 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 3:08 PM -0400 2006-08-07, James Ralston wrote: > >> Perhaps, but we cannot solve this problem, and there's a fine line >> between working around stupidity and coddling it. > > Right, but if we can't fix the problem of the multitude of broken > MTAs out there, and the fact that most of them probably don't assign > the appropriate extended response codes in accordance with the RFCs, > then the likelihood is that we are going to be lead to make the wrong > guesses based on the response we get. We already do that. This is the problem that we're trying to solve, not a new problem introduced by the proposal! -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
