Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 24.01.2007, 20:13 -0500 schrieb Dan MacNeil: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Alternatively, a message to a members-only mailing list could > > automatically trigger a subscribe challenge that, if acted upon, not > > only subscribes the sender, but also approves the held-back message. > > I often miss stuff but near as I can tell this would be a bad thing. Joe > Job/backscatter wise. > > Zombie soliders 1-n send email on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] to list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Worst case, list-L sends N subscribe challenges to joe. > > Likely case, Joe gets a (1) challenge and clicks "this is spam", thefore > making it harder for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get her list emails. > > Best case, Joe gets (1) subscribe challenge and ignores it.
Currently, Joe would get N messages telling him that he is not subscribed. If he marks these as spam we get the same result, don’t we? Thus adding a “self-approve mail” link or a “subscribe” link to this message this scenario is not any more likely. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Debian Developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
