Barry Warsaw writes:
> Part of me agrees that this is what you'd like to see, but my gut
> tells me that this will never work in practice. First, no one but an
> email geek will even understand the question, let alone know how to
> answer it,
Agreed. It's a stalking horse for the BCP; for anybody who's not an
email geek, I have this simple advice regarding the BCP:
Run away! Run away!
> and second, I fear that most u/i's and policy engines will
> boil this down to a very simple choice for the user:
>
> This message is unverified
>
> [Accept] [Discard]
> (o) Do the same for all similar messages
Make sure no spam gets through your double opt-in list, and you're
golden, no?
Similar is *not* going to reduce to "is unverified"; too many
grandmothers will lose messages from the grandkids.
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
