Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Dan MacNeil writes: > > > Stephen J. Turnbull quoted out of context: > > > I see your point, but why won't my suggestion of defaulting the per > > > user no-dupes to "on" do fine from that point of view? > > > For my selfish purposes, "no-dupes" off is a better default setting. > > Without a copy of the message to their mailbox, many of my users will > > keep sending the same message because it "didn't go". > >Are you thinking of not-metoo?
I think Dan must be thinking of not-metoo, but note that even ensuring that not-metoo is off won't do the job for gmail users thanks to gmail's 'feature' of not showing 'duplicate' messages. BTW, just for the record, the Defaults.py setting for new_member_options for a new list (DEFAULT_NEW_MEMBER_OPTIONS) is no-dupes. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
