Barry Warsaw writes: > I propose that no matter which way we go (Mercurial, Bazaar or > something else), we convert only the trunk. Let's leave the stable > 2.1 branch on SF under Subversion, but do all new development in the > dvcs.
Why not do both? That is, if Tailor does its thing well, we can cheaply have a dvcs mirror auto-synced to the svn 2.1 branch. If Mark and Tokio *both* agree, then we can abandon the svn branch. *Until* they do agree, people submit patches to the tracker as usual. I predict they'll get used to the "pull the 'this-patch' branch from my repo @ URL" style right quick, though.<grin> _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
