On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:08AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I think the GFDL would probably be more appropriate: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#FDL > I'm not as well versed on this license; what do people think about that?
The major issue with the GFDL is that for a while, Debian considered it to be a non-free license. I think the current status is that Debian now considers GFDL-licensed docs with no unmodifiable sections to be free, so we shouldn't have any such sections. (This is going by http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001#outcome ; is anyone here a Debian developer and know if that's the latest status?) Terri Oda wrote: > >information... all should be in one place. I was trying to explain > >to one of my department sysadmins where to find mailman help, and it > >was *embarrassing* when I started listing off the docs I wrote, the > >FAQ Wizard, the mailing lists, the help files included with the Yes, we definitely need to clean up on that respect. For example: * Are bugs kept in Jira or on SourceForge? (http://www.list.org/bugs.html says there's a transition going on.) * http://www.list.org/{docs,admins,users,...}.html would need to be updated. * The README says Python 2.1 or later is required, but it looks like Python 2.3 is actually needed these days. I've created a Launchpad branch, small-fixes, with some updates to the docs. This branch could be merged into 2.1 at any time, once someone has proofread my changes. --amk _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
