Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Barry Warsaw writes: > > Mailman to something like SpamAssassin. One of course would be a > > fairly simple handler to recognize SA headers and do the appropriate > > thing. > > Why have a Handler when you can already use header scanning in the > privacy filters? Ie, isn't this a documentation or UI problem rather > than a Handler problem?
I agree, it's a UI problem. What I'd like is that privacy/spam administration page had two checkboxes for "Filter obvious spam" and "Filter propable spam" (or smthng like that). These would be handled internally like spam filter regexp, only difference would be that those regexps would be configured in mm_cfg.py. And there shouldn't be Reject as a possible action for these rules. In mm_cfg.py site admin could enable/disable/hide these and set default actions for these rules. That way list admins could easily e.g. discard obvious spam messages and hold probable ones. -- Eino Tuominen _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp