> '%s: bounce message w/no discernable addresses: %s' You are right it's more consistent
> The part I'm not sure about is adding the list name to the > '(forwarding|discarding) unrecognized' messages. One or the other of > these is always written immediately after the 'bounce message w/no > discernable addresses' message, so the list name isn't really required > since the list will be identifiable with the first change, and it may > even seem redundant, but I think it's more consistent to include it on > all the messages. I agree; it will make grepping a listname much easier -- Fil _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
