Barry Warsaw wrote:
Now I can hit 'reply' and inject myself seamlessly into that 2 year
old thread.
As long as the mailing list name/address hasn't migrated/changed in
the interim...
Good point.
...perhaps the original message munged to ensure current accuracy of
the to/cc/reply-to fields?
Not sure I understand; can you elaborate?
We can tell from a mailing list's configuration what the distribution
address should be, but I guess we don't know what previous addresses it
had, so it's not as simple as I was thinking to do this munging (I was
thinking just a search/replace).
Maybe the appropriate modifications from the original message would be
to add as a "To" address the current list address iff it does not appear
in the To or CC addresses in the archived message (and to re-set
ReplyTo, if reply-to-munging is set).
-Dale
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
