Barry Warsaw writes: > [Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers > since it was spelled "mailman-de...@python.org" -BAW]
Thanks. > In general, I like Stephen's proposal as a way to help reduce the > ambiguity in this very common workflow. I'll bikeshed on this detail: > I think the header should be called Response-Precedence or maybe List- > Response-Precedence. Fine with me, either way. I waffled on the name anyway. > The 'List-*' prefix is evocative of RFC 2369 and since this is a list > specific header, it should probably be prefixed as such. It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists, not users. As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be prefixed "List-". > As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have no > idea how much work is involved. ;) For anything related to Reply-To/Mail-Followup-To, it's probably a pretty long road. I wouldn't mind having an RFC in my cv, though. (It is *not* going to List Domain Signing Policy, though, that can of worms I'll feed to the fish.) _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
