> -----Original Message----- > From: mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark....@python.org > [mailto:mailman-developers-bounces+msk=cloudmark....@python.org] On > Behalf Of Richard Damon > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:27 AM > To: mailman-developers@python.org > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs > > > Well, I also don't agree with characterizing this as a defect in the > > DKIM RFC. > > I would consider an RFC that tells some people they need to violate the > laws of their country to follow it to have a defect.
The RFC doesn't say you have to do that. What it says is the list should re-sign if it modifies the message (or, in general, re-sign anyway). So append whatever you want, just re-sign the message. Are you insisting that advice is defective? What it also says is if you want author signatures to survive MLMs, then you have to re-think those practices. But nobody really expects that right now, I think. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
