On 08-04-12 17:48 , Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 02, 2012, at 08:04 PM, David Jeske wrote:
The question i "would you BUNDLE another archiver even if the licenses
don't match?"
If you're donating the archiver to the GNU Mailman project, for us to
maintain, release, bundle, and develop, then I think that would be a very high
hurdle to overcome. Sorry, but it just is.
Would it work for everyone if David licensed the archiver to Mailman
under the GPLv3+?
(There could still be a question about the license for contributed
patches over whether they could be pulled back into the main tree or
not, but as long as it was reasonably clear one way or the other, I
don't think it would be a problem in practice. On the other hand, I am
an optimist... ;)
Later,
Blake.
--
Blake Winton Thunderbird User Experience Lead
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
