Jeebus, finally catching up on this thread. On Apr 24, 2012, at 01:41 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>IMHO, premature optimization. Among other things, there isn't going >to be a "the" archiver-core. Mailman should provide "a" >archiver-core, and I think it should be based on maildir (which is >apparently Barry's intuition, too). Theory and implementation of >maildir are simple and robust, and that allows us to concentrate on >the archiver interface. In fact, the prototype archiver already implements maildir storage. This storage isn't exposed via REST yet though. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
