Bob Puff@NLE writes: > I don't want more servers (processes). I need secure, > low-footprint, low cpu-utilization processes.
You're not going to get more processes unless you want them. The processes currently planned are just called "runners" now, and will be less coupled than currently. Whether the particular implementations under development are going to work for you, "you know it when you see them", I guess. I wouldn't advise you to hold your breath if *secure* is really high on your list, though. I think the new architecture is going to be overall more secure (eg, better handling of authentication), but evaluating that in a corporate security context is going to be just as much effort and annoyance as any time you introduce a new application. (If not, you should worry about whether your security people are doing their job!<wink/>) Steve _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
