On 10/20/2012 11:06 AM, Scot Hacker wrote: > > Here's a simple 2.x diff in case it's useful to anyone: > https://gist.github.com/3924229
Thanks. I'm inclined to implement this for the 2.1 branch, but my taste is to do it differently. I would prefer to have a -n|--nomail option which if specified would set the added members to nomail by admin, the default in the absence of the option being current behavior. Thus, no need for --enable-mail=<y|n>. Also, If the member to be added is already a member, I wouldn't change its delivery option. Would such an implementation work for you? -- Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
