On 13-02-27 12:33 PM, Chris Cargile wrote:
the Moin system will get us away from the Atlassian licensing hassle
AND would tie in great for enabling a new website for the MM3 release,
Um... Chris, you do realize that we're experience software developers
working on a project under the banner of the free software foundation?
We're reasonably familiar with licensing issues and how they relate to
mailman! The message you sent (which I've mostly snipped) is not only
un-timely at this point so long after the decision about switching was
made but also seems a little patronizing in context.
Would the merges accepted propogate document changes to the package
repos or are we referring to a merge against a documents-repo that is
somewhere I don't know of. I'm still confused on where the sphinx
documentation plays into it (is that maybe like building javadocs
only, instead it does so for python, maybe)
There is a docs directory in each project. There is no separate docs repo.
Mailman's is here:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/mailman/3.0/files/head:/src/mailman/docs/
Postorius' is here:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mailman-coders/postorius/trunk/files/head:/src/postorius/doc/
and I don't have a link for Hyperkitty's handy but I'm sure you can find
it yourself.
And now my turn to border on patronizing: My recommendation is that as
a new contributor, you should really stick to editing the wiki until you
have a sense of what you're doing and let the devs maintain the
documentation for their own packages.
Terri
_______________________________________________
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9