Franck Martin writes: > We are not asking mailman to do the work of DMARC here. There is > openDMARC for that.
Of course you are, in feature #1. Unless you take it literally (reject all email that comes from such a domain, *including* email that would authenticate correctly in a full DMARC implementation). I think that the appropriate interpretation of that feature request is that "in some cases, Mailman needs to play the role of MTA in the DMARC protocol." Anything less than a full implementation is a denial of service and screws everybody: the domain owners, the recipients, and the Mailman site admins, list admins, and moderators. And us, who will take the lion's share of PRs for it even if it's a third-party module. Steve _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
