On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:35:55PM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > The first question is should it be [email protected] or > [email protected]. The former is more of a recognition that > Mailman 3 is now Mailman while the latter offers less possibility for > confusion with [email protected].
I'm guessing you meant mailman-users@ vs mailman3-users@. For those that look at the address they're sending to, there's already mailman3 in the domain, so I'd say adding a number is probably superflous (although could be a belt and braces approach). > Then, I suppose it could be > just [email protected], but we might want to support other 'users' > lists in the future. Unless I'm really misremembering, MM3 isn't so fussy about unique localparts/listnames; so other users lists in the future might be on separate (sub)domains. Generally speaking, though, my preference is to include the project name; not only does it make autocomplete easier, but in composing a new message I'm more likely to send it to the right place. My preference would be: [email protected] // plural [email protected] // singular, relates to project not individuals mailman-foo@mailman3 // other lists which is pretty much the approach I've used with a bunch of other projects and lists. -- The computer is only a tool. Unfortunately, so is the user. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
