Twilley, Jack writes: > I have been sponsored by an organization to port the existing DMARC > code from Mailman 2.1 to Mailman 3. While my primary > responsibility is to satisfy the organization's requirements, it is > very important to me that the resulting product be a viable > candidate for upstream. > > I would appreciate any constructive guidance on how to best achieve > my goals.
I think the main issue will be any changes from Mailman 2's "Handler" API to Mailman 3's "Handler" (message-altering) and "Rule" (non-mutating) APIs, and how to communicate between them if both rules and handlers are used. Of course you're also welcome to do algorithmic and style cleanups (the original from_is_list implementation was submitted by a third party and we were in a hurry to do something so the style is suspect -- I admit haven't looked at it, but somebody[tm] should :-). _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
