On 03/22/2017 04:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Also references to existing knowledge would be appreciated, such as > "zero knowledge" schemes that might allow untrusted root on Mailman > host, and the various implementations like SELS that have been > mentioned.
In my proposal [1 or 2], I concluded that a SELS like proxy encryption scheme doesn't apply well to Mailman's existing infrastructure as well as the stated requirements in the project idea. -Jan (Just to note, I have recently updated my proposal, make sure to have the latest version) [1]: https://neuromancer.sk/page/gsoc/mailman#technical-details [2]: https://neuromancer.sk/static/mailman.pdf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
