On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, at 10:51 PM, Aaryan Bhagat wrote: > Somewhat details regarding this can be found in > [this](https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-developers@python.org/thread/N7LB2VQN5MC7INXTP3N2CF7MJYSZQI3W/#5ELFHHN4FDLXHXLDVBYKLX36GQTWJTWV) > thread also. > > Currently, in the `mailman/src/mailman/runners/bounce.py` I do not see > whether the separation of bounces as `hard` and `soft` is implemented.
Looking at the code in `src/runners/bounce.py` I don't think temporary failures are even stored. It seems like they are just ignored. > According to the previous version of Mailman, the `bounce_score` is > increased accordingly ( see the `Bounce processing` section of > [this](https://wiki.list.org/DOC/Mailman%202.1%20List%20Administrators%20Manual) > page ) depending upon the type of bounce. I intend to follow that > implementation. If not required I can drop that implementation and just > increase the `bounce_score` as an integer always. I don't think we should be increasing the bounce_score on soft failures, which can be retried by the MTA. > > Pointers on this issue are appreciated. > Am I missing something here? > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/ > Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 > > Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 > -- thanks, Abhilash Raj (maxking) _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list -- mailman-developers@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-developers-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-developers.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: https://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: https://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
