Thus spake Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, circa 5/25/2006 9:54 AM:
> Generally speaking, the recommended solution is to automatically
> reject such messages -- which informs the sender, and allows them to
> take appropriate action.

In the old days, this was certainly true, but today, when 70-80% of all
emails on the internet are spam, you may easily find that rejecting all
those messages will (a) eat up a lot of your internet bandwidth, and (b)
exacerbate the problem by telling the "sender" of the message -- which will,
90% of the time, be a forged address -- that "their" mail was rejected.

I have a handful of lists set to "reject," but most are set to discard. In
my opinion, the poster should be subscribed to the list and set to receive
mail; otherwise they should have no expectation that their message was
distributed.

     peter

-- 
Peter C.S. Adams
Director of Information and Communication Technologies
College of Public and Community Service, UMass Boston
"Be civil to all; sociable to many; familiar with few; friend to one;
enemy to none." -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack


------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Security Policy: 
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&amp;file=faq01.027.htp

Reply via email to