On 7/6/18 1:44 AM, Christoph Groth wrote:
>
> The only solution that I see is to manually create spam filter rules for
> the most notorious names on the discard_these_nonmembers list. Is there
> a better way to keep graded response to spam and at the same time use
> discard_these_nonmembers?
Maybe.
header_filter_rules are checked before list membership and
*_these_nonmembers. You could rearrange the pipeline to put Moderate
before SpamDetect, but that would have undesirable consequences.
So I think your choices are what you suggest above or remove the
'X-Spam-Level: \*{2,}' rule from header_filter_rules and implement a
custom handler to hold messages that match that and insert that handler
in the pipeline between Moderate and Hold.
See <https://wiki.list.org/x/4030615> for info on custom handlers.
--
Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org
