On 1/25/21 5:02 AM, Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2021-01-25 18:39:15 (+0800), Onyeibo wrote: >> >> I couldn't help noticing this thread since I am dealing with DMARC >> issues at the moment. May I use this forum to ask: Which approach is >> better in any given scenario between "Munge From" and "Wrap Message" >> (i.e. a little insight on when one is a better choice over the >> other)? > > In my experience, "wrap message" has the same downside as digests ... > people will reply to the wrapper rather than the wrapped message (as > they would reply to the digest rather than to an individual message > within) and break the thread for everyone else. > > Very few mail clients seem to support replying to nested messsages. > > Munging appears to strike the right balance between frustration and > functionality.
I agree with everything Philip says. Wrap message effectively sends each message as a MIME format digest containing the one message. Just as some people, mostly depending on their choice of MUA, will prefer plain text digests over MIME, and vice versa, some will prefer a wrapped message over a munged from, and vice versa. In short, which is better depends on the characteristics of the list and its members, but in general, from munging seems the better choice, although arguably and in the opinion of the Mailman developers, munging the From: header in this way makes the message non-compliant with RFC 5322 and its predecessors. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
