Alexander Inzinger-Zrock via Mailman-Users writes:

 > I considered ARC to be obsolete (and to should-be-replaced-by DKIM
 > 2)?

Not a chance.  Both "ARC Failed" [1] and "DKIM 2" [2] are expired
drafts.  Doesn't mean they won't get picked up in the future, but
there's not momentum for them now.

ARC remains somewhat useful and not terribly burdensome for an
intermediary such as a mailing list to implement.  "ARC Failed"
trash-talks ARC, but DKIM 2 as described is not a replacement for ARC
that is helpful to mailing lists.  In fact, it's more problematic for
mailing lists than DMARC itself.  Many Mailman mailing lists will find
it impossible to participate in DKIM 2 at all, as I understand the MUSTs
in that draft.

(1) There's no reason to suppose that mom-and-pop ESPs and ISPs sending
posts to mailing lists will implement DKIM2 section 2.2 quickly if at
all.

(2) See 2.4.1.  Many mailing lists also remove and discard "problematic"
MIME parts, and transform top-level text/html to text/plain, but do not
satisfy the conditions that make this less problematic for "security
gateways".  So such mailing lists are likely to have trouble with any
recipients that bounce mail that cannot be restored to original signed
content.  This is *worse* than DMARC because the draft provides no way
to recognize such sites, nor any way to remedy the mail except to pass
through content that violates list policy.

Steve


Footnotes: 
[1]  
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-adams-arc-experiment-conclusion-00.html

[2]  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-motivation-02



-- 
GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization)
Sirius Open Source    https://www.siriusopensource.com/
Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
    https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/
Member address: [email protected]

Reply via email to