If you have the sender address in the Reply-To:, do you still expect responses to go to the list?
-- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 In an Internet failure case, the #1 suspect is a constant: DNS. "Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-) [How to ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] On Sun, Sep 28, 2025, 17:27 <[email protected]> wrote: > Specifically the kind where all list emails come from the the same > address, with the sender in Reply-To? > > It seems like this /should/ be the way it works. Isn't that what Reply-To > is for? > > Do some email clients still mess it up? If they do, wouldn't it make sense > to just send them a bounce notice and tell them to clean up their act? > > Context: considering moving to a paid email service like Mailgun or Twilio > and having random unverified email addresses in the From: header seems to > be a nonstarter for them, which makes sense. > _______________________________________________ > Mailman-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ > Archived at: > https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/V52PHFXHIA2JZWGDZWLQFWQZMEBMOY4L/ > > This message sent to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Mailman-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://lists.mailman3.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.mailman3.org/ Archived at: https://lists.mailman3.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PYTQAO527W3CVULYAOT7W63CJD35VMHV/ This message sent to [email protected]
